The „Status Quo“ Problem: Why Antagonists Are Too Easy to Defeat

The Trope of the Silenced Villain
Isn’t it interesting how often characters who make a valid point in a movie or video game are quickly written out of the story? It seems that as soon as an antagonist challenges the worldview of the protagonist effectively, the writers force them to admit fault or disappear.

Case Study: Silicon Valley
A perfect example of this can be found in the series Silicon Valley (an intelligently named show, considering the search traffic that term generates). Let’s look at the dynamic involving one of the main characters, Bertram Gilfoyle. Gilfoyle is a self-absorbed, condescending, and likely autistic programmer. He considers himself superior to everyone else, and his „edgy“ persona is rounded off by his membership in the Church of Satan.

In the narrative, Gilfoyle frequently threatens violence or dominance over those who disagree with him. Finally, he is confronted by a character from HR, Tracey. This woman initially has a fantastic narrative arc: she delivers a cutting speech analyzing exactly who Jeffrey is and introduces a rating system to keep him in check:

Bertram while I have you

Gilfoyle: You don’t have me

HR: Richard’s just tasked me with streamlining productivity and balancing headcount, can you explain to me why you
have no one working under you? just seems odd considering that the agile board is showing that you have a massive backlog.

Gilfoyle: You’re new here so I’ll forgive the patronizing tone I’m more concerned with being right than being fast and I don’t
like dealing with people to wit are we done.

HR: oh you’re that guy

Gilfoyle: what guy exactly

HR: the brooding arrogant guy who refuses to take orders self-taught coder who looks down on anyone who’s taken a class, you’re probably an atheist or something more contrarian you claim to be an anarcho-capitalist but you work here and pay taxes. You’ve probably read half of Neal Stephenson’s crypto nomicon and it’s about 50/50 whether you own a snake.

Gilfoyle: I finished crypto nomicon and you easily could have just looked in my file

HR:I didn’t need to. I’m assigning you five coders

HR: noted I’ll send them over first thing tomorrow

later:
HR: you know Mr. Gilfoyle, you’re right, you’re not that guy because at the seven companies I’ve helped to take public, every other that guy accepted their limitations took on a team and managed to get their work done. Some of them are now billionaires none of them would have gotten into a measuring contest with HR when they were two weeks behind so lucky us, I guess you’re unique

She had the moral high ground and the tactical advantage. It was the perfect setup for a narrative shift that could have redefined the series. But instead of following through, the writers made a controversial choice that highlights exactly what is wrong with modern storytelling…

Read the full analysis and discover why Hollywood is afraid of letting heroes fail…

You now have two options

You can painstakingly gather the missing information yourself, provided it is available elsewhere, or you can purchase this article quickly and easily for only 2,39  including VAT and have it right away.

I want this information now

Already bought it? Enter password here:

This content is password protected. Enter your password here from the previous step to view it.

Für dich vielleicht ebenfalls interessant …